During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
国务院有关部门、有关地方人民政府、核设施营运单位应当依法制定核事故应急预案，开展应急演练，做好核事故应急相关工作。
。搜狗输入法2026对此有专业解读
Everton's Hill Dickinson Stadium is one of the best connected UK stadiums
«А у нас есть»Россия первой в мире создала гиперзвуковые ракеты. На что они способны?5 октября 2022。同城约会是该领域的重要参考
// 反之（curTime ≤ 栈顶）→ 会追上前车，合并（continue），详情可参考旺商聊官方下载
Lex: FT’s flagship investment column